Monthly Archives: May 2013

Women’s Shelter Doesn’t Want Jodi’s Money!

From “The State vs. Jodi Arias” facebook site: (Credit to Laura Payne)

“Women Shelter of Long Beach does not have knowledge of the facts nor any opinion on the case before the courts which involves Jodi Arias. WSLB supports the process of the courts and we do believe the court will do it’s work. As we have no opinion on the case, we have asked the web site “JodiAriasIsInnocent.com” to remove our name from their website and believe they have done so. We had no prior knowledge of or involvement in the T-Shirt campaign on that website. WSLB is concerned for all victims of domestic abuse and our mission is to provide shelter, support services, and community education to help victims and work towards eliminating domestic violence in our communities. We would be pleased to accept donations that are given directly to our organization. Thanks for your support!”

Why Jodi Wants Death

For the longest time I thought that Jodi was asking for the Death Penalty to try to trick the Jury into giving her Life in Prison. You know- the old ‘reverse psychology’ trick. I thought- yeah, they hate her so much and she absolutely doesn’t want to spend the rest of her life in a cage (you know she’s so young, doesn’t smoke and her family has a history of longevity- though her Dad has cancer…) oh, and let’s not forget poor granny in the wheelchair almost comatose during the trial (but  a spry old fox when filmed leaving the jail after seeing Jodi- at one point she looks like she is talking on a cell phone and jumps over a curb. And doesn’t even look down. You know even when I was young if I had to jump a curb I looked down at it as I jumped. Please go to you tube and check this out!) But I digress…I have now changed my mind about the reverse psychology and here’s why:

She wants to ‘win.’ She has asked for Death, believes they are going to give her Death, but she asked for it so she wins! She will appear to be happy with the decision thus taking the victory away from the public. She got what she wanted! And as an added bonus she can continue to play the martyr. Because well, you know she is a ‘survivor’ of domestic abuse. I was abused/stalked and got a restraining order and went into hiding. There is NO WAY on this Earth that I would drive 1/100th of a mile to see my abuser, much less 1000 miles!  NO FREAKING WAY!!!!!

Donovan Can’t Contact Jodi

Image

From Monica Magnes:

“As confirmed by KPHO Channel 5 news, Phoenix, this evening, May 17th 2013, the Maricopa County Adult Probation Department has launched an investigation into convicted felon Donovan Bering’s association with convicted felon Jodi Arias. Donovan Bering is on Supervised Probation for a class 2 Felony Conviction, Arson of an Occupied Structure. She is forbidden from having contact with any convicted felon as stipulated in her Supervised Probation agreement.”

 

And another interesting tidbit:

From Ace Hunter who commented on the above:

“She is also not supposed to go to any bars but I just saw him/her on TV in a bar giving an interview and playing darts. So byebye Jodi’s twitter, website, art sale, t-shirt sale, fund raising crap.”

 

Another comment: (Lou Tracey-Walker):

“Somebody from another support group called the probation office and told on Donoman for tweeting and being in court every day. What I want to know is how could they NOT KNOW she was doing these things when this mega million dollar case is in their own backyard. OH and lady in a support group is getting threatening e-mails from Donoman she has them saved.”

 

And my favorite comment: (Denise Utter Pribe):

“She’s an arsonist and she should be behind bars too!! I almost feel sick when I look at her, PUKE!!!!”

 

This case has been disturbing in many, many ways. The savage way Travis’ life was taken is never far from my mind. One thing I didn’t expect was to see how many disturbed people are out here on the streets. Like a lot of JA’s associates/friends. I don’t know how long Donovan was behind bars but I’m pretty sure it wasn’t long enough. Really- to set fire to a building with people in it? Who were they? Were there children? How could ANYONE do such a thing?

Jodi Has A Friend?

Image

You may recognize her from a prior day in court- you know, the day Patti gave Mr. Martinez the finger? Well this is the stellar witness for Jodi Arias. I cannot wait for Martinez to go after her. I can’t remember looking forward to anything so much. Yes, Martinez can and will cross Jodi’s friends. I believe this may be one reason the family will not speak for her. Can you imagine her Mom having to tell the prosecutor that she never hit Jodi and didn’t even own a wooden spoon? But I digress…more about Patti…

Before I drop the bombs I need to give credit where credit is due. Chris Stark is someone I really admire. She has done more research on this case and had more breaking news about it than anyone anywhere as far as I am concerned. So because I respect her so much I just can’t steal all her research- I just want to give you a taste so that you will go to twitter and follow her. I promise you will not be disappointed. Follow her at: @stark3923.

Here’s a taste of what you will find, all tweeted by Chris today:

“PotHead” Patti

1. @stark3923-Chris Stark (research)

pic.twitter.com/ftUzYJdLMG

“This is Patricia Womack aka PotHead Patti. Patti laughs in court, wears daisy duke shorts in court, gave the finger to the prosecutor in court and believed JA was innocent until JA admitted guilt.”

2. Patti’s arrest:

pic.twitter.com/mgmpz5iHAz

San Luis Obispo Superior Court-

Criminal/Traffic Case #Mooo335247WOMACKPATR

DUI – Alchohol/Drugs- the drug was heroin.

She purposely spelled her name wrong: Patrisha Fawn Womack (Court Docs for this trial her name is spelled ‘Patricia’)

3. Chris has links to :

-Patti giving Martinez the finger in open court.

-Patti with tattoos /bra strap sitting next to Sandy Arias- both laughing in court.

-Patti’s transcript with Nancy Grace- where she says ‘you know’ every sentence and sounds drugged.

-Her facebook with lots of pictures.

-“Who is Patty” (twitlonger) where Chris goes into the pot growing with Jodi and details about the strange wedding where Jodi took the photos.

-The reason why Patti is doing all these interviews- 4 nationally so far.

Another tidbit I got by following Chris is ‘Tracey’ commented the following:

Tracey-@tandthoppers- “Patty is the one who was arrested after her 1st interview w/Nancy (Grace). Pills and Child Endangerment.”

 Funny how she had a real problem with being on the Court camera today since she has been on media and is all over the internet. When I started to research her I just typed ‘Patti Womack Jodi Arias’ into google and there she was!

 

Arias Trial 5/16- summary

  1. Judge reads the jury instructions. Decision must be based on evidence, not sympathy, passion, bias…The admonition (no talking about the case) is back in effect. Opening statements are not evidence. Witnesses cannot give opinion on sentence. Defendant is not required to speak. You will determine Life in prison or Death.
  2. The judge lists the mitigators the defense will present:

-She was 27 at the time.

-No prior criminal record.

-A good friend.

-Lacked family support.

-Was abused and neglected as a child and adult.

-Tried to make the best of life.

-Tried to improve herself.

-Is a talented artist.

      3.   You are not limited to these mitigators and you do not need to be unanimous. If the total of the mitigation is sufficiently substantial for leniency then it is a sentence of Life. If the aggravators are equal to the mitigators then you must choose Life. The defense has no burden and the state has no burden, you decide. Your decision is binding.

      4.   You can’t consider the financial cost of Life or Death.

      5.   Keep your mind open and discuss in the jury room. I will give final instructions before you deliberate.

 

Nurmi:

  1. Your verdict will determine whether JA will spend the rest of her life in prison or be sentenced to be executed. This is not a recommendation- the judge can’t disregard it. If Death the defendant will stand at the podium before you and be sentenced to be executed.
  2. The first phase had a presumption of innocence. The second phase the state had the burden. Now there’s no burden. Each one of you has to make your own moral assessment.
  3. Ms. Arias has to prove mitigating factors substantial for leniency to live her life in prison. This is not about the Jodi of 2006. You will hear more about before that so that you can understand whether her life should be terminated or not. And she will have the opportunity to talk to you in a different way.
  4. In the last paragraph of the instructions it says mitigators can be from any evidence in the trial. You decide what’s a mitigating factor. You do have to agree on the ultimate Life vs. Death, but you don’t have to all agree on the mitigators. One might consider her art, another her lack of a criminal history.
  5. This is not about an excuse. There are factors of character and history, lack of record and circumstances of the offense. Fairness and mercy come into play.
  6. Listed before you (exhibit) are 8 factors.

–       Her age-27

–       A good friend- you will hear from Derryl and Patty Womack.

–       Lack of family support (Patty)

–       Abuse and neglect as a child and adult

–       6, 7 & 8- Make the best of life, improve as an artist. She joined PPL and the Morman church to improve herself. Goals of motherhood, marriage and having a business. She’s a talented artist; you’ll see some of her artwork. One thing you will not see is she’s convicted of 1st degree murder.

  1. You filled out a questionnaire that said you could convict of 1st degree murder and consider a life penalty. Each of you are here because you said ‘Yes.’ That question is real because she’s right here. That’s what we expect you to do. You will understand Life is the appropriate penalty.

Martinez:

  1. The defense wants you to consider 8 aspects of her life. You can find other factors but the law says you cannot act as an investigator. Look at all the evidence, look at fairness and also look at Travis. You must decide by preponderance of the evidence.
  2. The 8 factors are flawed. Regarding mitigation there is a lack of connection to the murder. These factors are not of any importance.
  3. 27 years old- the fact she took a knife and stuck it into Mr. A.’s chest. Connection is something you may consider.
  4. No criminal history- what does that have to do with the murder?
  5. A good friend? To Whom?
  6. Family support- her Mother’s been here; that’s support. It has nothing to do with the killing.
  7. Abuse? Where’s the connection?
  8. Do the best in life? What does that have to do with the murder?
  9. Art? Again- what does that have to do with the murder?
  10. No criminal history- when she testified she was untruthful to you. Remember the gas cans? She took an oath…that is a crime.
  11. In 27 years she had 4 boyfriends and numerous jobs. Brewer will say she was a good caregiver to his child. She has lived a lot in those 27 years.
  12. A good friend? To this individual? When and how is this a mitigator?
  13. Lacked family support? How do we know this other than from her mouth? When speaking to you there were inconsistencies. Child abuse? She was on the stand for 18 days  and there’s no evidence to support it- just her word.
  14. Make the best of life? Isn’t that what we all do?
  15. Artistic- paintings and photography. I guess she’s good at photos- she took those shower pictures like a ‘Calvin Klein’ ad and she can delete those images. This is nothing more than the defendant’s statement to gain sympathy.
  16. The only appropriate sentence based on jury instructions is Death. Thank You.

(Stephen and Samantha Alexander come up and give their statements. I actually stopped taking notes to watch this part, and you should too. Have Kleenex handy. Writing these emotional statements out doesn’t do them justice. I will put in a link for the video at the bottom of the page.)

Afternoon: Court cancelled until Monday at 10.

Link for Statements:

What’s Next For Jodi?

Tomorrow at 10:30 we will begin the Penalty phase. First up will be statements from Travis’ loved ones. They will be able to express how his loss has affected their lives. After that we have the mitigators. There are two types:

1.  Statutory mitigators:

  • The age of the Defendant;
  • The Defendant’s capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of their conduct or to conform the Defendant’s conduct to the requirements of law was significantly impaired, but not so impaired as a constitute a defense to prosecution;
  • The Defendant was under unusual or substantial duress, although not such as to constitute a defense to prosecution;
  • The degree of the Defendant’s participation in the crime was minor, although not so minor as to constitute a defense to prosecution; and
  • Any other factor that the Court deems appropriate to the ends of justice.

2.  Non-statutory mitigators:

  • Remorse;
  • Love of family/concern for parents;
  • Lack of criminal history;
  • Employment history;
  • Low intelligence;
  • Prior military service;
  • Disparity between sentences (as in between co-defendants); and

     Prior sexual and/or emotional abuse.

The defendant will be able to bring on witnesses (I heard Alyce LaViolette may make an appearance) and she may also stand and address the jury herself.

Finally the jurors will deliberate for the last time on the Death Penalty or a Life Sentence.

I understand they can impanel a new jury if they are not agreed.

From: Arizona Mitigation- http://www.arizonamitigation.com/what-are-mitigating-factors/

 

 

Arias Trial Summary- 5/15

Aggravation Phase

Judge reads Jury Instructions.

Martinez:

She made sure she stabbed him over and over and over again and slashed his throat

He mentions her ‘painful’ suicide attempt and how excruciating Travis’ pain would have been during the attack. He takes us through the murder step by step. “It is only death that relieved that pain and anger and that is especially cruel.”

Nurmi:

All murder 1’s are cruel. This was not ‘especially’ cruel. You have to consider her state of mind and how the brain functions as mitigating factors.

Martinez:

He suffered pain every time the knife went into his body. He was able to see, breathe and hear- he knew what was coming.

Dr. Horn/Martinez:

Damage to nerve endings cause pain. A pierced heart can feel like a heart attack, affecting breathing and causing pain. JM takes us through the photos pointing out with each that there was nerve damage and therefore pain. He mentions the divots in the skull and the defensive wounds. Then he shows the throat picture and establishes Travis was still alive. There’s scalloping along the wound from either decomp or several attempts to cut the throat. The throat is not easily cut due to cartilage. Before this cut he could speak.

Willmott:

After the throat cut he wouldn’t have lasted but seconds and he wouldn’t feel anything so wouldn’t feel the shot. The top of the throat didn’t have scalloping. The chest wound didn’t cut the heart. Flight/fight means he had adrenaline and he was moving so he would bleed out faster. Adrenaline would have also precluded pain.

Martinez:

Regardless of the time he was alive when stabbed, slashed. Even with this adrenaline reaction he could still see, breathe, hear. He stands at the sink and can see, hear, feel, smell and think. Even with adrenaline he can still feel pain. The decomp can account for the scalloping but so can multiple wounds.

Jury Questions:

1.  Did you testify that Mr. A. had 3 rapidly fatal wounds?    Yes- the heart, the throat and the gun shot.

2.  In regards to the throat what’s more likely for the scalloping?     Because of the decomp I can’t really say.

Martinez:

Though all 3 wounds were fatal the chest wound would take minutes if not moving. The throat would have been seconds. He would not have been able to defend self or move around after that. The shot would have made him unconscious in seconds.

Willmott:

The first wound was the slowest but would have been faster due to movement.

State Rests.

Defense Rests.

Closing- Martinez:

She made sure Travis did not go gently. She also made sure he went nude. He was vulnerable in his shower, seated. Totally unaware. We know he felt the knife to the heart. Extreme mental anguish- he can see, breathe, smell and this is the person he was just with. Adrenaline or not it hurts, and she knows it hurts- it hurt too much for her to commit suicide. A knife in the heart- like a heart attack. She’s still standing, he tries to grab the knife and more pain. He can’t even get away- more mental anguish. It’s a paper cut to the Nth degree. He grabs the knife 3 times. This hurts. His hands and chest are bleeding. He’s still in a small area with a woman who’s ‘pretty strong’ according to Ryan Burns. She never lets go of the knife. He’s wanting to get away- what is he thinking about? His dog? His family? The grandma she sent irises to? To see himself bleeding. Not thinking about a vacation. He tries to get to the sink and get her to leave him alone. Adrenaline takes away the pain? Actually adrenaline talks to fear and terror and pain. He sees himself in the mirror. He’s in pain- is he screaming? Do you think he was quiet as a church mouse while all this is going on? He’s stabbed on the back of the head…sees blood, causes anguish, see’s the defendant. She’s striking the head- the knife goes into the head and causes a divot. That it painful. Seems like a short period- but it’s interminable for him. Lets just sit for 2 minutes (we wait 2 minutes). And now he got his throat slashed. Seem short? No- he’s continually stabbed and followed. It’s painful. Her ‘suicide’ was too painful. She gave him no choice. He tries to get away down the hallway but he has no strength. He’s bled out. He’s down, but still alive, seeing, hearing, breathing. The last thing he saw was the blade coming down to his throat. The last thing he felt before he left this earth was pain. Defense ‘Only 30 wounds.’ It’s especially cruel. Travis suffered enough for 2 lifetimes. He was stabbed in the heart and ran and his throat was slit.

Regarding jury instructions- to find especially cruel:

  1. Pain? He was conscious. He could see, hear, breathe. From the shower to the hallway the defendant was with him. He was conscious- he ambulated.

Physical pain. ‘It stings’ (referencing the suicide attempt) well he was stabbed on the back of the head, back of body, throat. He did suffer physical pain. Not what you want to do on a Sunday afternoon. He could see himself bleeding and being attacked. He tried to get away. He goes down and can’t defend himself. The defendant comes over- how absolutely horrific as the knife comes down. He knows. The defendant slits his throat. 

  1. Did she know he would suffer? She’s 27 years old. She knows what’s going on. She’s been cut at work, at Travis’ or stabbing him. Any reasonable person would know a stab to the heart would cause pain. She’s past her teens, almost 30. When she continued with the back? Absolutely. The throat is sensitive. That’s where she went. Every step of the way she knew, he’s hurting. Every time it goes in. The woman with the high IQ. It was directed to the neck. She knows. Whether Mr. A. was in fear or adrenaline doesn’t matter. She should have known how much he was suffering, until she put him into another life, and that is especially cruel.

Nurmi:

The jury has to determine whether cruel or especially cruel. He says to be mindful of the jury instructions- no sympathy or sentiment. A detached judgement. Has the state proven beyond a reasonable doubt? You have to give the defendant the benefit of the doubt. All first-degree murders are cruel to some extent.

The 2 elements:

  1. Suffer pain? The state changed it’s story from 62 seconds (where her story couldn’t have been true) to 2 minutes to play on sympathy. Dr. Horn/Flores changed testimony regarding the gunshot. If shot first no suffering. The experts talked about fight/flight and adrenaline preventing pain.
  2. Defendant knew he would suffer? About that suicide attempt- it was after she was in jail and the state said that it didn’t happen. She has to be conscious and processing what’s going on. Dr. Demarte said she had BPD and that she could have an extreme violent outburst. That’s what happened on June 4th. She didn’t know as she was functioning under this mental defect. Put emotion and sympathy aside. It’s hard not to react to the crime scene photos. Your job is to detach yourselves. The experts told you about her mental condition- she didn’t know she was causing pain. That is evidence enough. This aggravated factor was indeed not proven.

Martinez:

He is arguing instead of facing the evidence. He told you the state was trying to fool you. Not talking about the facts. The defendant should have known. She knew what a camera was and which of the 2 cameras had the photos she deleted. She cleaned up. If she didn’t know how did she even know she had done anything wrong? Who Travis even was? She cleaned up, took her clothing and put on the license plate. That’s the weakness of their argument. Of course she knew what was going on. You already used these jury instructions. They don’t want to talk about what happened. Changing stories? Why talk about that? He puts up a series of autopsy photos while asking: “Why don’t we talk about this?” Then he shows the shot to the head photo- the ‘Coup de Grace.’ In this case there is no doubt he suffered immensely. It can be physical OR mental pain. Dr. Samuels has a bad track record and Dr. Geffner is a ‘hired gun.’ If you take a knife you are going to hurt someone and cause mental stress. We don’t know the exact time of the first cut or when the throat was slashed. In those 2 minutes blood was gushing, the mental stress was only relieved by death. Thank You.

Judge gives instructions.

Deliberations begin.