LaViollette-Jury Q & A

*This is not an exact transcript, I got as much as I could.

  1. Did you read entries from before Travis’s and Jodi’s relationship?

No, I didn’t…I had limited information from 2006-2008.

2. If you read earlier entries, would it have given you a better picture of Jodi Arias?

I read a lot of info from her family and boyfriends prior to that so I got a pretty good picture of JA. I saw the 7 hours from 48hrs but other than that-one e-mail from the sister.

 

3. What did you learn about Travis? I learned from reading what he wrote in a book and some of his blog. He was a motivational speaker, good at knowing his scriptures, from as abusive childhood, survival as a child was tough, he was made fun of (for not bathing) he had verbal and physical abuse and was neglected, attractive to women, the Hughes (friends for 5 years) were concerned about how he treated women, his anger from his own words and how he talked to women in private.

4. Do you think Jodi Arias could have lied to you to help her case? When I first met Ms. A she was very protective of Mr. A. She had a hard time looking at herself as a battered woman (as it takes 2 to tango). Then in reading from men who lived with her none described her as a liar. She kept things from her parents…typical of a teenager…lying is not unusual- The Arch Bishop lied, Lance Armstrong lied, Bill Clinton lied…about image…a lot of us lie about stuff less serious than killing someone.

5. Could Jodi Arias have exaggerated to help her case? She tended to minimize.

6. Is it possible friends and family may have embellished in an effort to help her? I guess, except that friends and family didn’t seem to go overboard. I read Mr. A.’s words directed at her, the disrespect…looked at the escalation process. They didn’t say ‘Gee, she’s this wonderful person.’

7. What did you discover about Travis when looking at email, text, and IMs to other women?’ Tend to push sexual limits, pushed PPL on them. He was very good with women but also irritated women- was pushy. He knew how to play them effectively. He shared his faith- insinuated his way into their confidence. He empathized with them, one husband didn’t let her have friends…he said ‘go to the Bishop.’ Another’s ex-husband was verbally and physically abusive and addicted to porn…he empathized.

8. Is it common for women in abusive relationships to snap and commit violent acts towards long-standing perpetrators? “…In a self-defense kind of situation <stricken from the record> not easy to answer with Yes or No// (// means Martinez objects and the Judge goes on to the next question).

9. Is it possible for the survivor to be the perpetrator? It’s very possible for somebody to lash back. Michael Johnson calls it ‘violent resistance’ – yelling or hitting back. Most of the time violent resistance is an explosion of yelling and screaming. It could be physical or violent. Haven’t seen it (with women) much without a weapon.

10. We have heard that Jodi kicked her mother, called her sister stupid, etc. , So would this characterize Jodi Arias as an abuser? I believe that happened when (she) was a teenager- an angry teen. Calling her sister stupid is not uncommon. Kicking and hitting her Mom, I don’t approve -teens do a lot of things not good to do. Anger with her Mom was part of her history. There’s no evidence of physical violence with her Mom as an adult.

11. Why would a perpetrator be abusive in one relationship, but not another?  I missed)

12. Have you ever seen situations where victims kill their partners because they see no other way out? Depends on the level of intensity. Travis’ relationships were not long-term, it takes time; it’s a progression, it doesn’t happen right away. Lisa felt disrespected in a short relationship- they broke up 3 times. Others didn’t like how he talked…via the internet. It’s not difficult to be non-aggressive with someone not spending time with you…from folks I’ve worked with relationships were intimate the person they are most committed to gets the most abuse.

13. Is it conceivable that a woman can kill her partner just to get away from the abuse? I worked on one case where that was true. It is conceivable but it is rare. Is it possible that Travis and Jodi were in this type of relationship? It doesn’t appear to me- there’s no evidence of it…no evidence it’s true. Travis is the one escalating and being aggressive and in her prior 2 relationships there’s no evidence she was violent, aggressive or jealous. Could there have been abuse on both sides? Generally with DV it doesn’t stay at that level and the latest research is over time the male gets more violent.

14. If Jodi slapped and kicked her mother in the past could she be seen as a perpetrator? She could be seen as aggressive when she  kicked and hit her mother in the past. I look at power differences//

15. Do you feel it’s possible Jodi could be exaggerating abuse events? I think anything’s possible when I look at the kind of escalation with Travis and listen to friends it’s very difficult for me to believe that.

16. How does it affect your assessment when you do not have the full story from both individuals? Often murder cases don’t have the story <Objection>  there’s no access to the other side. You gather the info you can-I read boxes of info…and get as much as I can from both sides so I’m not biased.

17. In your opinion, is it possible that Jodi could have also been a perpetrator in her relationship with Travis? I don’t see any evidence of that.

18. Is it possible Jodi could be guilty of psychological abuse towards Travis? Anything’s possible, just no evidence of it. I looked at prior (longer) relationships and neither Brewer (4 years) nor Matt (2 years) indicated she was abusive, controlling, jealous or manipulative. And she remained friends with them.

19. Could any of Travis’s actions be considered defensive, rather than abusive? Any of us can get angry or upset, the difference is the kind of tirades- beyond defensive to the extreme.

20. Can two children facing identical abuse situations end up handling them differently as they become adults? Sure- when you grow up in your family it’s not just what’s dealt but how you see it’s dealt. Siblings can see things differently. You can find someone you can count on- Uncle, Grandfather, you can change. Some blame their self or the parent. Community can help- church, scouts, sports teams-positive things can have an impact.  However, the brain’s learning level from (age) 0-6 is exponential. People with really negative things in family of origin need some counseling.

21. Does it concern you at all that you can’t get a full and complete story from Travis? Yes, I wish I could…I can only take what I got from friends, women, his writing. I got as complete a story as I could get.

22. How quickly can abuse escalate from the first time two people meet? It’s very different. Usually there’s a period of time where it’s not happening…it varies…everyone’s different. Once it escalates there’s a //

23. Prior to Lisa Andrews and Jodi, do you know who Travis’s girlfriend was? Can you describe this relationship? (I missed some due to link going down)  something about the best years of her life…loaned him money, not sure he ever paid back.

24. It has been proven Jodi has lied multiple times since killing Travis, how are you able to know everything she is saying is truthful? I don’t…I got collateral evidence…I believe she’s telling me the truth about most things. Because she lied after the killing doesn’t make her a liar. She was a frightened human being – it doesn’t make her a liar. (As far as) her character before this event- I didn’t hear she was a liar from anyone.

25. Did you ever see any proof that Travis physically abused Jodi? The only thing I saw was a broken finger.

26. Isn’t it possible that Jodi did not write some things in her journal because they never happened? It’s possible although Travis didn’t rite in his journal//

 

27. Have any of your patients ever killed their partner? Yes.

28. Are you able to confirm Jodi ever abused Travis? No evidence of it, and her relationships with other men, or any exchanges between the two of them. It’s possible but there’s no evidence to support it.

29. Would you classify Travis’s and Jodi’s relationship as a love/hate relationship? I would classify it as an abusive relationship.

 
30. Is the violence level of Jodi’s response to neutralize the threat consistent with what a victim of abuse would do? Part of a conversation- she told him she’d bring them.

31. Other than Jodi’s word, what evidence do you have she received Spiderman undies or the pink tshirt from Travis? (I missed)

32. Has Jodi continued to write in her journal after June 4, 2008? I haven’t seen any after June 4th. I don’t know.

33. Please provide the time frame when you worked with Jodi. I spent 44 hours in the jail with Jodi (Judge asks ‘dates?” ) First visit- October 2011-2 days, then within 3-4…don’t know exactly. Four to five different visits, 8-6 hours, 6-7 hours, 3-4 hours. Spread out.

34. Regarding the argument in the car, you stated Travis slapped her across the face. Is that exactly what Jodi told you? No it isn’t exactly what she told me- the jaw I think of as the face//

35. Please state how confident you are that Jodi did not lie to you? That she did not lie to me about what? Like ever? I don’t believe she lied to me about significant things…it’s possible.

36. Can you describe the connection between Travis’s childhood and his behavior? Yeah it’s not vague at all. The most significant factor in abusive relationship is the worst child abuse equals the difficulty in having a non-abusive relationship and Travis’s childhood was incredibly abusive. His Dan kicked the door in, threw him across the room, there was no food, Mom slept for days and Dad wasn’t around.  They abused each other. (Travis) ate moldy bread. When exposed to this you learn combat survival-hyper-vigilance. There’s a direct link between what you’re exposed to and how you handle it. Especially with no intervention.

37. Are you aware if any ex girlfriends of Travis said he was physically abusive to them? There were no ex’s who said Travis was physically abusive.

 
38. If Jodi was that upset at what Travis was saying to her in text messages, why didn’t she stop talking to him?
39. Other than Jodi, did you interview anyone else face to face? No I did not.

40. Are you aware Jodi’s grandparents house was broken into two days after the IM session? Yes, I’m aware the Grandparent’s house was broken into.

41. Wasn’t it a known fact that Travis was trying to find someone he could marry? It was a known fact. I just…the conversations would not lead you to believe he was trying to woo somebody- sexual from the beginning.

42. Have any of the women who Travis had a relationship with said that he abused them psychologically, verbally, or physically? Lisa-in putting her down, not respecting her values, said being a teacher would suck. Another girl complained…Nicole- Travis told her no one would date her. It’s important to me//

 

 
43. Did anyone ever mention concern or suspicion of abuse regarding Travis or Jodi during interviews with other people? Matt mentioned he believed she was verbally abused and maybe physically abused.

44. Please define the word “survivor”. We used to use ‘victim’, survivor is more positive and sounds better.

45. Could a survivor also be a perpetrator? Yes…with violent resistance they can lash out. The dominant aggressor who is the primary offender has the most power.

46. Could a female abuse, batter, or terrorize a man to the point of killing him? Yes, women can be perpetrators. The percentage …in surveys, ER rooms, crime reports//

47. You claim that Jodi not getting medical attention for her finger is consistent with other battered women. What would prevent the battered person from getting medical attention and lying about the cause of it? There are people who get medical attention and lie about the cause.

48. If the name-calling was only between Jodi and Travis, wouldn’t this just be name calling and not character assassination? No, character assassination doesn’t have to be in the presence of others and usually doesn’t. It tears apart who you are and is worse because you love that person.

49. How do you validate the information presented to you without talking to both parties in this relationship? By using collaborative data. Looking at different things- like he wrote ‘I don’t like whores’//

50. Wouldn’t you say it’s reasonable that Travis might get irritated that he couldn’t leave a voice mail for a week while Jodi’s mailbox was full? Well he said ‘empty it out’ without ‘please- that’s how I read it.

51. Is it possible your view of men in general is skewed or biased towards them being abusive? Actually I have a lot of male friends, family and a son. No…they are not abusive. I have worked with male co-facilitators one with for 20 years. (She goes on & on about men she’s worked with, her Dad, brothers…etc.)

52. Did you real all of Jodi’s and Travis’s journals or just the portions provided to you? I only read portions- what was provided.

53. Do you believe it was possible that Travis said some of the negative things towards Jodi because she was stalking him and he wanted to distance himself from her? No I don’t believe that.

54. Did Travis speak negatively in his journals bout any of the women he was seeing? No I don’t believe he said anything negative in his journals.

55. In the magazines you sent Jodi in jail, she wrote hidden messages in some of them. Were those hidden messages for you? I had no idea she had written hidden messages to anyone. And I didn’t receive any.

56. Jodi’s old friend said she liked to play the victim. Even though that was in high school, is it possible those traits stayed with her? I don’t have any evidence of that.

57. Is there any reason we should believe Jodi has not manipulated you as she has others? I’m not sure who you believe she’s manipulated. //

58. Why have you looked at Jodi multiple times during the cross to meet eyes with her and give her a smile? I have done on occasion just to acknowledge her. I looking at friends from school. I’ve tried to avoid looking at her. Let’s see…Maria’s in the front row, my father was here yestrerday…

59. Do you have personal feelings for Jodi or feel sorry for her? I have feelings…I have liked Jodi in terms of working with her. We haven’t had a relationship since the 44 hours I spent in jail. I’m clear on my own boundaries. If I thought it would get in my way I would step away from it.

60. You looked at Jodi, gave a half smile and shrugged your shoulders when Mr. Martinez was marking evidence. Why did you do this? Wow – I didn’t even know I was doing it. I don’t even remember…I don’t know what to say.

61. Why would you believe the things Jodi told you happened before the killing? I believe those things because of corroborating data. I wasn’t there during the physical incidents…much was corroborated with other sources.

62. Hypothetically, if you were to discover Jodi exaggerated rather than understated the abuse would you have a different opinion? I would certainly re-look at things because that would be important. Bur rage and escalation with Travis in his relationships and leading up to things; his childhood abuse- writes ‘I don’t like whores’// Not just what Jodi says, what Travis says and his behavior. You don’t have to be perfect to be a victim of abuse.

63. When assessing this case, to which did you more weight: written or verbal communication? Well, I had much more written so more weight to written. Interview with Jodi in jail- sometimes behind a screen I really couldn’t see clearly (the screen)- got inflection and tone in an uncomfortable environment. I relied more on written.

 
64. Do you feel that being able to interview Travis gives Jodi an unfair advantage in telling their shared story of abuse? I wish I could have interview Travis. I got part of my info from his close friends. The way people see him, his own words, childhood, interviews. I feel like I got a picture of Travis.

65. Are you aware of phone conversations made before, during, or after the texts and IMs you reviewed? I’m aware there were phone calls…and I get confused which is which…the sex tape was recorded. I don’t know if there were more recordings, I had texts, e-m’s etc.

66. Did you ask Jodi if phone calls were ever part of those exchanges? Yeah, follow up calls made I didn’t have dates on those.

67. Of the 18 forensic cases, how many were cases where a male was the victim of abuse and not the perpetrator? Of the forensic cases that I’ve done//there were at least 2and there as one where the father killed the son in law//

68. You pursued family of origin for Travis, why didn’t you pursue Jodi’s? I did assess Jodi’s family for abuse- her level of abuse was much lower than Travis’…same sex role modeling- women victims as opposed to perpetrators- I did not rule that out. Travis’ was far more violent.

Arias trial 4/11-morning session

Re-Direct- LaViolette/Willmott

Morning:

  1. Sexual humiliation (Travis as the victim). The ‘dildo with a heartbeat’ comment is just one in a long tirade and AL doesn’t base her conclusions on just one comment. Sixteen days before that Travis had phone sex and said he wanted to visit her. May 2 he sent a text about a photo shoot fantasy and was very graphic. Therefore he wasn’t humiliated.
  2. Interview with JM was in Mesa and AL didn’t bring all the boxes of info with her from Ca. The ‘shot in closet’ was in her notes but she now claims JA did not tell her this. It was not “…a big factor in determining domestic violence. AL was not interested in details of the murder and said: “…I made a mistake.”
  3. Matt and Bianca were still dating when JA went to see her. It was ‘not a hostile, angry confrontation’ and JA didn’t call/contact her after that.
  4. The cut finger from cutting apples was a second hand story and was told when JA was still lying about the killing.
  5. JA was not clear about where the knife was and ‘couldn’t remember after the attack at all.’
  6. JA wasn’t jealous as she was pursuing Ryan and others on LDS Link-up.
  7. JW brings up the abuser gets fearful when their partner is trying to leave and this is the most dangerous time. Travis did say in his journal that her moving away would be better for both of them. There was nothing about Travis fearing JA in his journals.
  8. ‘Proof” he was a pedo:

–       Sent her boys underwear (and mentioned in a text).

–       She was clean shaven (waxed) as he preferred.

–       He though pigtails were hot.

–       Had her dress as a schoolgirl.

–       Comment on sex tape about the 12 year old girl.

–       He liked ‘porking the pot of a little girl’ (??)

–       She caught him masturbating to pics of little boys.

  1. JA was with Matt for 2 years and Derryl for 4. They remained friends. She was close to Derryl’s son. JW: “Ever see them accuse her of being a liar?’ AL “No.”

10. Regarding stalking and Travis being in fear: It was just one statement and AL doesn’t rely on just one statement.

11. Travis’ truthfulness:

-Lied about his virginity to the church.

-Portrayed self as a virgin.

-Priesthood holder who didn’t follow the laws of the church.

-Lied to friends and family (re-virgin).

-Dated Lisa and JA at the same time.

-Abusive men hide there abuse from work and family. (So many don’t believe the person really did these things).

-Abuser will be rage-full to those closest to them.

-He had a lot to lose in business and with the Hughes’.

-JA was the only one who knew of his secret life.

      12.  JA’s truthfulness:

              -Lies started after the killing.

              -Lied about being there, then 2 intruders.

      JW: “Do those define her…”AL: “No, they don’t. If (she) was a really goon liar she would have planned a really good lie and she didn’t.”

 

Afternoon session-Jury questions and answers-

This will take me until later tonight to compile. I will post as soon as I am done.

 

Arias Trial 4/10

Martinez cross examines LaViolette

Morning:

  1. JM gets AL to admit that in an i-m with Regan Travis said that he was afraid of JA and her stalking behavior.
  2. JM takes out her Continuum. He asks if Travis’ frightened response indicates he was being stalked. AL disagrees, saying he didn’t behave that way.
  3. JM points out that after the relationship ended JA moved from California to Mesa, closer to Travis. AL says that’s not an indication of stalking.
  4. JM brings up the incident where JA was watching him with another women through his window. This indicates Travis had moved on, and that she was stalking him. AL says: “she tried to go through the garage… and she immediately left.” JM points out she had to be there for a while watching to see them kissing and the bra strap undone. (AL waffles…) AL is admonished by the Judge for not answering the question. JM asks AL: “To go to an ex’s house and in the window…stalking?” AL: “No.”
  5. JM points out that there is nothing in JA’s journal about her peeking in the window. AL just says it is incomplete. JM deduces that therefore her journals are not a complete picture of the truth. AL gets in that Travis was talking to other women. JM points out that AL is making that sound like a ‘really bad thing.’ AL says: “Not at all” in her most condescending voice.
  6. JM manages to get in that Lisa was the aggressor with Travis and he actually refused her advances at first. Also that AL never spoke to Lisa.
  7. Al says that JA going over to speak to Travis the day after seeing him with someone through his window is “Not stalking…when I look at everything.”
  8. After this the stories about abuse start. Regarding Travis throwing her down…AL admits she could have just left. Then the incident in the car- no reports of it anywhere. Not in her journal. AL says: “That would make sense.” and JM says: “That’s because you’re biased.” AL says every man in her group would say Travis was abusive. JM asks if she bases her findings on what the men in group say.
  9. Dan Freeman testified that Travis asked JA to ‘Move away’ at the end of January. AL has not heard this.

10. JM points out that the story JA told about pedophilia and the threat to tell others is another form of stalking/abusive behavior. AL calls it ‘blackmail.’ She says people being stalked have behaviors regarding the stalking. JM asks if Travis asking JA to move would be a behavior in response to stalking. (AL goes off on not seeing a pattern…)

11. JM points out that despite all these incidents of stalking she chooses not to believe it, but she does believe JA is abused based on her word. She says stalking and domestic violence are 2 different things.

12. JM brings out her continuum. He points out JA’s family history:

Dad-lies, sexually inappropriate, mean, controlling, pushed her.

Mom-beat w/spoon, screaming at her.

AL admits these are family of origin issues.

13. AL says she: ‘misspoke’ three times telling JM in her November interview that Travis was looking at pics of boys on the computer, even with her notes present. She says it’s not in the journal because JA promised not to write negative things. JM says that this is always to JA’s benefit, and there’s no corroboration. AL says there is- in the sex tape.  JM says no corroboration but she still believes JA regarding the pedo incident and AL says: “I believe that.” She says he talks about “Porking (I think that’s what she said) a little girl in the sex tape” and “orgasm like a little girl,” and then asking her to wear “Spiderman underwear.” JM asks if she knows who Cameron Diaz is and that Travis was into her. AL has no idea. JM says: “So far there’s no interest in little boys?” AL says: “No.”

14. JM brings up the incident where she told Travis she was moving and he supposedly hit her. AL admits there is no proof but JA’s word. JM says there is no proof of Travis being stalked just like there is no proof of JA being abused.

15. AL admits Travis saying he felt like a ‘dildo with a heartbeat’ is ‘not a good thing.’

16. JM breaks out the continuum again and aligns the ‘dildo’ comment with humiliation and degradation. He gets AL to admit you do not have to have every qualifier on the list to be stalked. He lists (pointing out these are on her continuum) that JA made Travis afraid, sexually degraded him, and had a poor family of origin. He says: “It does appear the abuser was the defendant.” AL: “Not at all…not in my assessment.”

Afternoon Session:

  1. According to AL’s interview JA knew the gun was unloaded and she said she shot Travis in the closet.
  2. AL says JA told her that the knife was used to cut the ropes after he tied her up and then left on the nightstand.
  3. JM goes into the text May 26 and lists some of the comments like ‘You are a sociopath’ and ‘you only cry for yourself’ and asks if there is any reason to believe he’s not telling the truth. She says it’s just an argument where they are name calling. Again JM points out she believes JA’s words but not Travis’. She admits she doesn’t know what he is angry about. JM reads: “You are the worst thing that ever happened to me” and says “and that is true in this case.” (It is stricken from the record).

Re-Direct by J. Wilmott:

  1. JW goes into why battered women’s syndrome isn’t in the DSM 4.
  2. JW compares JA’s family history of abuse (limited) with Travis’ (drugs, verbal and physical abuse…)
  3. AL goes into her continuing education requirements and how she exceeds them.
  4. AL defines ‘Keynote Speaker.”
  5. JW says Travis picked women who were vulnerable because they were married, younger, single moms, or chaste.
  6. They go into feeling jealous (common) vs. a pattern of jealousy (used to control). Also that JA had a hard time breaking up but she ‘wasn’t jealous.’
  7. AL says Stalking is a pattern of behavior and that the person being stalked is in fear and doesn’t connect with their stalker.
  8. JW points out that the same day Travis complained about a stalker he was texting JA. And JW points out he was in contact with 3 different women that day.
  9. JW goes through the following examples to prove Travis was not afraid of JA:

-He texted he ‘loved her’ in January.

-He took her on 2 trips.

-They were in constant communication.

-They made a sex tape.

-He texted: “Let yourself in.”

-He called her pretty “inside and out.”

-JW claims JA went to his house June 4th because he asked her to.

-He contacted her the day after they broke up.

-They fell asleep together June 4th.

-He let her clean his house even if he wasn’t home.

-He asked her for some nude pictures-He threatens her (to tell everyone    she’s ‘crazy.’) (JW says this is nasty and untrue.)

-He’s jealous when she sends a text to another guy to him by mistake.

  1. 10.  JW claims JA would not send a text to incur Travis’ wrath.

11. JW claims JA does have a high IQ but that it doesn’t affect her self esteem.

12. AL says just because her journals don’t include every detail they are not incomplete.

13. JW points out that if JA wanted to she could have lied about being abused to prove her claim. She then has AL go into all the reasons why women ‘don’t tell.’

14. AL says JA showed her the broken finger.

15. JW goes into the argument about the back-pack and how Travis said harsh words and chased JA upstairs.

16. They go over Travis telling JA to tear out journal pages.

17. JW says JA never wrote all the bad names Travis called her in the journals either.

18. AL says she doesn’t take every case and she wouldn’t take cases if someone’s lying to her (or not enough time, or not enough info).

19. AL said she apologized when she met JA because she felt she had invaded her privacy.

20. Regarding truthfulness-The childhood friend was a long time ago, the manager at Purple Plum was 20 years later, and her Dad calling her a liar, well all teens lie.

21. JW says Travis was not sexually degraded because:

-He wasn’t uncomfortable with Lisa-she felt used

-The phone sex tape

-He did oral on her first time –she was the one who was uncomfortable.

Resumes tomorrow at 10:30

(From: http://mixedbagblog.com)

Arias Trial Summary 4/9

Martinez vs. LaViolette

  1. JM gets AL to admit that she based her opinion ‘in part’ on the 44 hrs of talking to JA and that she found her to be “believable.” AL says she did not rule out secondary gain as a motive for JA to lie but that she focused on Domestic Violence (DV).
  2. AL only spoke to one party (JA) and didn’t speak to Travis. JM points out that because she said: “communication is 90% non-verbal” that would mean her assessment is 45% wrong.  AL says: ”No.”
  3. AL admits JA lied after the killing but maintains she was not a liar before that. JM asks who she interviewed to confirm that (no one). JM asks if she ever talked to JA’s Dad. AL: “No.”
  4. Jury is sent out.  JM brings out JA’s Dad on tape saying: “…she’s never been honest with us since then and she was 14.” AL states that this was ‘not something she knew’ and that she wouldn’t use a sound bite as part of her assessment.
  5. Jury in. JM brings up that JA told her that the cuts on her hands right after the murder were from cutting apples. (WOW) Asked if she believed it she says: “I didn’t believe that,” then backtracks and says: “I don’t recall that I focused on that.” JM points out she never checked about this with any other source and mentions this is JA’s  FOURTH story about cutting her finger. Asked if that was a problem for her AL said: “I can’t answer yes or no.”
  6. AL has in her notes: “JA told Derryl she was taking a long trip to Mesa.” She also wrote on her notes: “I thought this was a last minute decision.” AL admits she wasn’t concerned about this after talking to JA and reading other evidence.
  7. JM gets AL to admit (after a long pause to think about the criminal cases she’s been on, and because it’s apparently been a while) she bases her opinions primarily on paperwork. (Not interviews).
  8. Apparently a Manager at ‘The Purple Plum’ called JA a manipulator in particular with men. But because no one said that about her at Casa Ramos AL says that is not a characteristic of JA’s. JM says she was manipulative with Ryan right after the murder. AL did say she could be manipulative at times but when JM then says:  Then it stands to reason she was manipulative 2 weeks earlier-the day of the murder.” She responds: “It doesn’t stand to reason.”
  9. JM gets in that a friend of JA’s from High School said she was not abused and she liked to play the victim. AL say’s that’s one person’s opinion.

10. JM asks if she thinks the Text she made up was used to ‘get a rise out of Mr. Alexander.’ She says it’s possible.

11. Apparently AL believes that making out with Ryan was to ‘make JA feel normal.’

12. AL admits she didn’t ask JA certain questions because she was ‘old fashioned.’ She points out she did listen to the sex tape. JM brings out the Tape recording of his interview with her where she says she didn’t ask who initiated the anal sex (with Matt or Bobby) because she’s ‘old fashioned.’

 

Afternoon Session

  1. Jury is out. Hearing on the recording of JA’s Dad and Det. Flores. JM asks if knowing about her lying to her parents changes her opinion. AL: “No it doesn’t.” JM says AL’s work on this case is ‘shoddy’ and her opinion ‘flawed.’ JA saw herself as the victim. The Judge rules the state may ask if her opinion is altered by this evidence.
  2. Jury in. JM asks AL if it’s a problem re: JA’s truthfulness. AL: “Correct.” JM says she was playing the victim even though she wasn’t abused <Sidebar> as a teen. AL thought she was younger.
  3. Because AL is old fashioned she didn’t really go into questions about the anal sex- JM asks about who initiated it. She doesn’t know, just that it was uncomfortable. AL says it’s not relevant. JM points out that if it doesn’t feel relevant to her than it’s not relevant?
  4. In her interview with JM, AL misspoke and said Travis requested that it be recorded. They get off on a tangent about how she had this interview in November and then she looked at more data later. JM had a problem with this as she had already come to her conclusion in November that JA was a victim of DV. Back to the sex tape. They argue over whether it’s better to actually hear Travis than just read his texts. AL says: “No.” They fight over secondary gain. When faking the orgasms comes up she drops “Have you seen When Harry Met Sally?” JM points out there is no real way to know if they were faking. JM goes back to how she just jumped to the conclusion that Travis requested the recording showing her bias again. (my feed is cutting out)
  5. Regarding the first sexual contact; oral- JA told AL she was uncomfortable. JM says she seemed comfortable on the tape. AL points out it was 7 months later.
  6. JM says JA has nothing negative in her journals partly due to the Law of Attraction. AL says there are some negatives. JM clarifies there is nothing about any physical abuse. AL agrees. He says : “Nothing about Mr. Alexander ever laying a finger on her-correct?” AL: “Correct.” JM “Nothing about masturbating to pictures of boys?” AL “No.” JM: “But you still believe the defendant?” AL: “Based on other things…”
  7. JM asks about when Travis supposedly hit her the day she was leaving. AL admits she took JA’s word for it. JM goes into Dan Freeman’s testimony where he had a conversation with Travis about how he wanted her to leave and told her to leave. AL says it’s important but there’s no evidence and JM says: “Assume he came into court and said it.” AL admits that if that’s true it would have been important to her but it doesn’t mean there was no DV.
  8. JM goes into the fight before the trip to Havasu (sp) and Alyce does not know who started it. JM compares the journal entry which says the trip ‘didn’t start out very well’ to what Dan Freeman testified to. AL admits (after arguing) she took the journal entry as truthful. JM goes through Freeman’s testimony point by point saying “assume that” after several points proving JA’s journal entry is at the very least, incomplete. It takes a while but AL finally concedes the entry is incomplete.
  9. Regarding AL’s contention that JA has never been jealous. JM gets AL to agree (after arguing again) JA may have left her jealousy out of her journal because it was negative.

10. JM goes through what he refers to as a pattern of jealous behavior with JA’s previous boyfriends- from the phone calls to the leaving food at the door to going to see Bobby on weekends (even though he moved to Oregon) and sleeping in his bed uninvited. AL says she just has a hard time letting go. AL does admit it ‘could be the beginning of a pattern.’ JM brings up her confronting Bianca. AL says they just ‘had a talk’ and that this is not controlling or jealousy.

11. JM brings out an exhibit (I believe the ‘continuum’ she made up). He says that it’s not a pattern of jealousy but it IS A PATTERN OF STALKING!

12. JM mentions the text where Travis says he is ‘exceedingly afraid of her stalking behavior.”

Martinez vs. Alyce 4/8

Juan Martinez cross examines Alyce LaViolette

Morning Session:

  1. JM reviews that AL based her opinion of this case on 44 hours of talking to JA and reading numerous documents.
  2. JM gets AL to say she did not use the Continuum for this case, then she has to back track as she did use it to describe a ‘range of behavior.’
  3. AL misrepresented herself as the Keynote Speaker at a Conference in LA in 2010. JM brought out the conference schedule and nowhere is she indicated as the Keynote Speaker- Katherine S. Connell was the Keynote speaker. AL admits it does not say she is “Keynote” anywhere, but she was involved in keynote breakout sessions.
  4. AL admits she never wrote any report for this case!
  5. JM points out her method does not require interviews. JM points out: “You’re willing to come into court and give an opinion without talking to Shatanya or Travis.” AL: “I didn’t speak to either one of them.” But she came up with the opinion that Shatanya was ‘vulnerable.’
  6. JM brings up her comment that 90% of communication is non-verbal.  Therefore she is 90% wrong on everything she read without doing interviews to confirm her opinions. AL says he is taking that out of context. JM points out that AL has no way to know if Shatanya was just joking as 90% of communication is non-verbal and AL is basing all this on written texts. AL says that Shatanya stopped communicating. JM points out she has no way to know if they stopped communicating as they could have spoken to each other by phone. She admits she does not know if they spoke by phone.
  7. Regarding Reagan and Travis’ communication. AL said that Regan was vulnerable, anorexic, and she was asked by Travis to send photos of her in a bikini. JM points out she readily believed everything Regan wrote in these texts but doesn’t believe what Travis wrote about how he had a stalker and that he was ‘extremely afraid.’ AL admits she choose not to believe him, with a qualifier (based on his behavior).

 

Afternoon Session

  1. JM points out that AL made judgment calls on the relationships Travis had with other women based on texts without ever meeting anyone.
  2. Back to Snow White- they argue about Snow White being battered. JM points out she also found Snow White to be a victim without ever speaking to anyone (because you couldn’t!)
  3. JM says her opinion is subjective. They go back and forth over this, including going into DNA for a bit, but all we have to rely on is her interpretation- nothing can be verified by tests and another person could come up with a completely different conclusion based on the same facts.
  4. JM brings up a text where JA told AL one name and apparently told Travis 2 other names. AL points out that Travis may have made a mistake. JM points out that since AL jumps to the conclusion Travis made a mistake and not JA  she is biased. JM also points out that she adopted the story that JA told her about a girl approaching her in the restaurant to tell her about Matt cheating as the truth. (She believes everything that Jodi tells her!) JM brings up that JA told the same story to Travis- that 2 girls came to her in the restaurant and said Travis was cheating. JM asks if that should raise a red flag. AL says she would need clarification. AL admits JA lied after the killing. Still she says Travis is the liar and JA has no ‘pattern’ of lying. (Really??) JM adds that Travis had a right to be angry over her lies.
  5. On to the text JA supposedly sent Travis ‘by mistake.’ (Actually to make him jealous). He’s asking for a second text- she stands up to him and doesn’t send it. Then she ‘made up’ another text’ and sent it to him.  AL somehow missed that, then said it wasn’t as important as the way Travis talked on the text. AL implied it didn’t make a difference that she lied as she ‘has no pattern of lying.”

Afternoon Break

  1. When AL first met JA she apologized to her! JM says there is no need for a forensic investigator to apologize when they first meet a client and that she felt sorry for her. JM also points out that she bought JA several books. AL says she has done so before.
  2. When interviewed by JM, AL told him after meeting with JA she had a ‘good feeling’. JM implies she is biased.
  3. Regarding JA’s self esteem…JA was excited to get her IQ tested because she believes she’s as smart as Einstein(!) And she’s signing Manifesto’s because she believes she will be famous. AL says JA’s self esteem wasn’t tested until after she had been in jail for years.

Nurmi deceives Chris Hughes

Following is a letter from Chris Hughes- I have not yet verified it’s authenticity but it seems legit.  Credit to Shirley Accatino for this info.

 

Chris Hughes The State vs Jodi Arias ~ Travis Alexander murder trial
February 9 at 2:28am · ..OK, so I have been pretty quiet through this trial…so far. We have decided to not do any media until after the trial is over. We had no idea how hard that commitment would be to keep as we had underestimated the attack that would be made on Travis. But we made it, so we will keep it. That said, there are a few things I need to clear up that are floating around on the net…..

IT (Jodi), being IT, came up with a whole new set of lies in 2010. Lies, I would imagine, she is going to try to work into this trial, as she fights for her life. I didn’t think she would attempt to do this as there is no evidence as to the validity of these claims. There are only letters conjured by IT that were thrown out of court and deemed “fraudulent.” I just figured she, and everyone on her team, had given up on these ridiculous claims until I read the posts below:

“It also makes you wonder just how much Chris & Sky Hughes really knew about TA’s child addiction (and the physical/verbal abuse he inflicted upon Jodi in private). Remember Sky’s initial reaction to one of TA’s letters too, where she specifically referenced TA’s age of attraction?” and “(& subsequent cover-up of TA’s abuse & child porn-related issues) by Chris & Sky Hughes.”

UNBELIEVABLE! Are people really this delusional? This info is from fake letters…too fake even for the National Enquirer to run with! That is saying something! Some of you heard me call Nurmi a liar. It was related to these claims. He had LIED to my wife. He emailed her a letter, telling her it was “100% verified to be Travis’ writing” and that there was “irrefutable evidence” backing up these claims. #1- It’s near impossible to verify something 100%. AND it is absolutely impossible to even come close if there is no original (which we later found there is not). #2- There is no, and never has been “irrefutable evidence” to back up these claims. He totally lied! Sky’s reaction to what Nurmi sent her had ZERO to do with Travis and his character, and EVERYTHING to do with Nurmi’s lies and manipulative tactics and her experiences working with sexually abused kids. The ONLY reason Sky even went there, as far as Travis was concerned, was because Nurmi told her there was “irrefutable evidence,” and to us, the only thing irrefutable would be video tapes. We had NO IDEA that it was legal for the defense attorney to lie about evidence to try to sway someone’s testimony (we had been subpoenaed to testify in a hearing the following week). Unbelievably unethical in my opinion.

I just wanted everyone to be aware of this, because I’m guessing Jodi, being the shamelessly evil person she is, is going to make these asinine claims! Here is what we know about Jodi… and it is truly “irrefutable.” Jodi lies…and lies… and lies… it’s just what she does, and who she is. She has done it from the beginning, and we can expect more of it until this trial is over. To expect anything other than lies from Jodi would be naive at best. Travis is not, and never has been, a pedophile. And only the most despicable of human beings would accuse someone of being such, knowing they are not. There is nothing worse.

LaViolette = Regret?

I was thinking about how many people Arias has managed to throw under the bus and after hearing about Ms. Alyce LaViolette’s (the defense expert currently on the stand in the Jodi Arias murder trial) speaking engagement being cancelled in Long Beach yesterday I thought I would check out the review of her book on Amazon. It is called “It Could Happen To Anyone: Why Battered Women Stay” (2nd edition) Here are a few of the Amazon Reviews:

 

1.  This is one of the nicer ones:

 

1.0 out of 5 stars Don’t waste your money on this garbage., April 5, 2013

By 

L.RossiSee all my reviews

This review is from: It Could Happen To Anyone: Why Battered Women Stay (Paperback)

“Read this book if you want to send your life in downward spiral – the book reeks of hostility to men, and you will be trapped in your fear and loneliness forever. Author of the book is so obviously outdated in her knowledge of what it takes for a woman to survive in 2013, I wonder if she still lives in the 70s. She states rather obvious facts, but does not offer any solution for those who are trapped in abusive situation or those survivors of domestic violence who learning how to heal their life . Don’t waste your money. Look at the books by Lundy Bancroft or Edward Kubany instead.

By the way, Ms. LaViolette cashed on the bloody murder, and her professional opinion is for sale. She collaborates with attorney who is specializing in defending child molesters and rapists – how is THAT for domestic violence advocate?”

 

2. Here’s one from someone who actually read the book:

 

1.0 out of 5 stars Devastating, April 5, 2013

By 

Cooper (San Diego, California) – See all my reviews

This review is from: It Could Happen To Anyone: Why Battered Women Stay (Paperback)

“After I read this book, it made me feel like I was the victim, I had to be put on a 72 hour hold because my psychologist thought I was suicidal she advised me that Alyce LaViolette is very manipulative and has a reputation of being a controller.”

 

3. And from someone following the Arias trial:

 

1.0 out of 5 stars The get away with man murder Manuel!, April 6, 2013

By 

Malissa WilliamsSee all my reviews

This review is from: It Could Happen To Anyone: Why Battered Women Stay (Paperback)

“Great book for anyone planning to murder the man in her life!! What? That a**-hole is a FLIRT???? And he LIED about his level of sexual experience????? Well that pig just deserves to be stabbed 27 times, have his throat cut to the spine, and because he also call you a crazy, evil, sociopath ( hmmmmm…) go ahead and cap him in rhe face with a 25. Yep, then call Ms. Alyce Laviolette! If you have $300.00 per hour ( and beware, she is long winded and LOVES, to tell story’s) she will tell the world why that “terrorist” had it comin! Oh, and if that jerk in your life had a less than perfect childhood, and you were ever whacked by a spoon , well girl, you’re as good as innocent!”

 

I would feel sorry for this woman but she accepted the job of supporting a violent stalker/ murderess without giving any credence to the other side of the story.  As of this writing there are 403 one star reviews (the lowest you can give) and only 17 five star reviews (the highest). There is no option for zero stars, by the way.

 

http://www.amazon.com/Could-Happen-Anyone-Battered-Women/dp/0761919953

Alyce in Jodi-land

Points made by the prosecution:

1.  After spending an hour building up AL’s (Alyce LaViolette’s) credentials JM (Juan Martinez) tore them down in minutes. Under cross she became an out-dated (no formal education in more than 3 decades), out of touch (she now lectures about Snow White being battered), under-qualified (because she has no PhD she cannot administer or score tests and is not qualified to diagnose anyone) joke.

2.  AL based her opinions on a 44 hour interview with JA (Jodi Arias) and her Journals. She never spoke to anyone else (just read some other things and watched the 48hrs interview). JM pointed out that despite being paid $250 and hour to read JA’s journals she could not come up with a direct answer without wanting to refer to said journals. He simply asked her if there was anything negative in the Journals about JA and she requested that he show her the journals. She had no problem with questions about the journals with the defense because she was reading directly from them as spoon fed by the defense attorney. In fact the judge actually busted her for reading from the journals directly. Not to mention these journals are just like “Snow White”: fairy tales and this is basically what this expert regurgitated on the stand for 6 days.

3. JM got AL to admit the ‘continuum’ she based her ‘expert’ opinions on was made up BY HER! She even admitted to him that she could alter it at will. When asked if there was any diagnosis for “battered Women’s Syndrome” in the DSM (the ‘Bible” of psychological disease according to the last defense witness) she admitted there is no such thing. (Oh, and if there was she is not a Doctor and not qualified to diagnose anyone).

5. Remember when AL went into great detail to point out that because Travis had come from an abusive family that he would grow up to be an abuser? (And according to her everyone else in that circumstance would unless they received some kind of therapy). Well here is how JM used the Fairy Tale “Snow White” to prove the exact same point about JA:

     -Snow White was abused by her Step-Mom and her Dad did nothing to protect her. JA was abused by both her Mom and Dad and neither protected her.

     -Snow White fled into the woods to get away from the abuse. JA fled to Bobby’s house to get away from her parent’s abuse and control.

     -Snow White ended up in a shack taking care of people. JA moved into one room of a hoarder’s house and she was the only one working and bring the food in.

     -Something bad happened to Snow White (the apple). Something bad happened to JA (Bobby choked her).

 -Snow White becomes unconscious and waits for her Prince. JA starts looking for her Prince. Unfortunately I think her Prince was Travis.

-Doesn’t this then mean JA would grow up to be the abuser according to this expert?

**Mr. Martinez accomplished all this in about 30 minutes.

IMHO: In this version of Snow White the witch was Jodi and the apple she lured Travis with was SEX!

   

 

 

Arias Trial 4/4

Alyce LaViolette/J. Wilmott – defense direct:

  1. Nurmi wants to sequester the jury (the jury is not in the room). He has a problem with Jodi’s parent’s police interviews and Jodi’s Journal. Also has a problem with HLN possibly video taping some of the jurors. Martinez- the jurors say they are not watching any media and will abide by the court’s instructions. The judge says she has asked each juror and they indicate they have not seen anything so she denies the request. Regarding motion for mistrial-Ms. Wong is apparently a witness for the Defense.
  2. AL takes the stand. Jury enters.
  3. Texts from March, 2008. Travis invites JA over and says to ‘make your self at home.’ Mentions Travis saying there’s a ‘stalker’ around to some women <Sidebar> AL says no evidence of any stalking activity. Late March texts- still a general relationship between them. Travis tells her to empty her voice mail as he can’t get through. <S> Travis communicating with ‘Krishell’ (sp)–graphically sexual- she was vulnerable. Journal (Travis’)- About JA moving to Yreka as good for both of them, he will miss her but wants to get married and move on. He needs more discipline. They argue through texts <S> he’s upset because she hung up on him (because he swore at her). She’s establishing a boundaries on this occasion.
  4. April 1-Text from Travis about how he will miss her. He’s apologetic and says she’s a fantastic person. Implying he feels he didn’t treat her right. Fourth violent incident- according to JA. Argument about her interest in 2 other men. He got angry, threw her down and choked her, she passed out. Life threatening- high on abuse scale. An escalation of the physical abuse. She says she started to defend herself but didn’t want to hurt him. Not unusual according to AL. JA minimizes the incidents- typical of abused women. April 7- texts-normal conversation which later turns into the long angry Text from Travis. (“Do not call/text me…”) He wanted the identity of the woman who came to her restaurant and told JA about Lisa. He threatens her – to tell others about all the crazy things she’s done. He was in a relationship with Lisa at the same time as JA .<S> They go into the ‘feel the wrath’ comment- abusive. Texts from the next day- she left a picture which he signed behind. He says she’s ruining his days. He asks her to stop before he seeks revenge. She is apologetic. He says he is trying to save his house. He says if he had done this to her she would cry for weeks. She is trying to calm him down. She tells him she loves him. April 8 he’s talking about JA and Deanna moving so easier to focus on marriage. (From his Journal). He misses Lisa and feels foolish for going after Mimi. April 19 Texts- He feels insulted by JA about his speaking ability. She tries to calm him down. She has physical distance but not a lot of emotional distance. <S> Next day he sends her a nice text about JA is one of the most beautiful <O> He is in a club and he compares her with other women-she’s beautiful inside and out.
  5. May-fights. He is the one ranting, she isn’t. JA accidently sends a text to him and he’s upset she’s communicating with another man. Even though they’re not in a relationship. AL- He’s jealous and insecure. He’s afraid of losing her. She’s apologetic. She still cares about him. They agree to stop talking about their intimate affairs with others. He says they should just stop talking. She wants him to stop ranting, but he keeps going…’Times are going to get tough for you.’ She’s ‘sorry’ and ‘loves him.’ He apologizes too. Conversation lasts more than 3 hours. Next day instant messages- about Wayne Dyer’s daughters teasing him about his temper. Travis talks about his temper <S> is far worse. JW reads the i-m to AL. Travis ‘if I could transmute that fury…” AL- Anger is huge energy and can be scary for them- hey need help. They are both acknowledging his anger. Later she talks about her self-esteem. She was the ‘innocent porn star’ who now feels bad about her self. He’s comparing her to 2 or 3 other women, and she has no sexual equivalent, that these other 2 were enjoyable, and a 3rd whom he didn’t get that far with. These women were before JA. Deception of his claim to being a virgin. Phone sex tape- indicates she still wasn’t fully separated from him. Journal (hers) May 22- The separation is good for them, Laws of Chastity- he gets upset. <S> Their physical relationship has to end. He wants to know who she’s seeing and if she’s ‘getting her kicks’ with someone else. She says she didn’t freak out when he was with Lisa. She tells him she hasn’t been with anyone else. (He’s jealous). She’s more assertive, but still attached. The abusive man has lost more power and so there is more rage. He has ‘undying love for Mimi’ and she’s ok with it. He apologizes. She talks about him positively. Sad that they are agreeing to part ways.

Lunch Break

1.  AL defines character assassination. More than verbal assault- assault on their character…much more harmful. May 26 text- a tirade from Travis to JA. Her ‘sick agenda’ a ‘pure whore’ and a ‘sociopath.’ She does not get angry. (6 hrs. long). Next- i-m’s-he continues with ‘character assassination’ and escalates it. She’s ‘rarely heard’ words like these strung together. (the i-ms last 16 pages). Give examples- ‘What a freaking whore’ <S> ‘corrupted carcass’ ‘going on to the next dick’ she’s a rotten lunatic’, ‘liar’, ‘3 hole wonder’, ‘worthless’, ‘he was a dildo with a heartbeat’…(My Live Stream Cut Out and I can’t find a new one!)

(OK…it’s back) <S>

2.  Talking about Travis suffering from severe verbal abuse as a child. AL- people learn from those who raise them. Need to get some mental health. Back to the i-m and JA referring to sex with Travis and how it made her feel more special. The more she complied the closer she felt. AL ‘men give love to get sex and women give sex to get love.’ Men and women judged differently- women get names like ‘slut’ where men are ‘studs.’ May 26…her journal- she talks about his tirade as ‘classic rude.’ She minimizes it. She talks about their pattern of getting into fights then making up. Says it is happening every few days. She compares Travis to her Dad in athleticism, republicans, rude then nice. May another journal entry about Ryan Burns and the Utah trip (her moving on). May 30- Has a plan for her trip. June 1 mentions seeing Matt and Derryl. She tells Travis about Utah and he’s ‘not thrilled.’ Didn’t want Travis to know about Ryan. Travis ‘gui;t’s her’ about coming to see him. She’s not going to see him. Travis is bothered by it but she reminds him he will be seeing her in CA. soon. Some texts between them- just conversation.

3. Communications between Travis and other women. AL- his ongoing deception. They happen late at night (most). Denise- <S> she is vulnerable. He flirts and makes sexual innuendos. Nicole- in a relationship. He is insulting her about the relationship and also flirts. Lisa- 10-11 years younger than him. She complained about his pushing sex. Deanna- still talking to. Krishell-Married- vulnerable –graphic sexual content. Regan-Flirting and asking for ‘close to naked’ pictures. He complains about an ex stalking him 3 days after he had phone sex with JA and after nice texts. She -Regan- was also vulnerable. Shatania-Vulnerable. Not LDS. Gave her the book of Mormon. Graphic sexual talk..having his head between her legs- something that occurred in the past. He was manipulative. He alluded to suicide because she wouldn’t come over. Eventually she stops contact. March lost Lisa, April lost JA (physically). Still missing Lisa. Maria- LDS. Sexual talk with her- sneaking her out of Grandma’s. He asks her how far they would go before they would have to see the Bishop- she doesn’t want to talk about it anymore. AL- He has a pattern of going for vulnerable women, pushes sexual boundaries. No long-term relationships, many over the internet, also joining PPL. He puts himself out there as a virgin. He has a problem with some women pulling away- desperation. <Afternoon Break>

4.  June 1st JA Journal- he’s ‘guilting’ her to come, later she does decide to visit him. AL begins to go through June 4th. Tying her hand to bed, take pictures. She showers, they look at CD’s-m it’s scratched, he’s upset…he bends her over and they have sex (to quell her anger). He wants shower pics- she drops camera- body slam, she runs and gets gun, he comes at her, she through gun wasn’t loaded and she shots and then doesn’t remember anything. AL was retained to see if there was DV in this case. How women cope with trauma- can repress/block memories, minimize, deny. Victims will detach from memories in part because painful and because they want to heal. With JA she was aware of her shame. Wrote and took pics of stuff she never thought would be seen. AL starts to talk about Travis’ escalating violence <S> he has the ability to be rage-full. Fear of partner leaving and powerlessness can turn to anger and rage.

Her opinion is that she was in an abusive relationship and is a battered woman. People are capable of an isolated act of aggression. Back to the Contiuum. JW asks her why she says JA is a battered woman. AL goes through the Continuum. And relates it to JA. Relationship didn’t start out abusive. Is this info all coming just from Jodi- AL: no- reviewed im’s text’s 48hrs, e-m’s, journals, exchanges between Travis and other women and JA. Being sexually intimate makes a difference. He never had issues with Lisa- they dated only 8 months and were’t intimate, no physical violence but sexual pressure and put downs. With Travis JA had a change in personality. Brewer says he saw her change. She maintained relationships with her exes. After Travis she was described as bi-polar (moody). She wasn’t depressed or suicidal before. Not described as a liar.

  1. AL sent her 4 books and a magazine subscription. “Do you have a memory proble?” AL: No I don’t . ..Feelings for JA…? No. Was JA ever aggressive or verbally abusive or controlling, jealousy- No”

CROSS:

  1. BA in 1969. MA 1980. Did not continue in her studies- no PHD AL: ‘but continued in studies’. No PHD means restrictions- no tests, can’t read tests, can’t score tests. DSM 4-She knows about it-psychotherapists also use. JM-No diagnosis of ‘Battered woman’ or ‘abused woman’.  AL: ”True”. What we have in this field in people like her with experience – clinical interviews- her sitting across from the person who may or may not be a victim-is ‘One of the things I use’. 44 hours was her clinical interview. –“yes”. Interview- are you talking-AL: ‘are you angry at me?’ Is that important to you? Does that make any difference…? Yes or no. It makes a difference how you speak to me. You perceive him as being angry does it have anything to do with your evaluation. <O> …No’
  2. Back to the interview- speaking to JA for 44 hours. …other interviews, and all the other stuff she looked at for an evaluation. Didn’t talk to anyone herself. Just read what someone else had written. No guide to tell when battered or abused- ‘That’s not correct’ (ex 558-contiuum) to tell in her opinion-‘ not the only thing “Do you want to spar with me…<S> She referred to it- Yes”. Questions about it and involving the defendant- “Not exactly’- I don’t relie on just this—as one piece of information. Journals-“I reviewed the Journals” Something in the Journal and how it relates to the continuum.  You indicated she never said anything negative-AL-“ I didn’t read anything negative.” You read other journals- Yes”. Nothing negative about the person she killed- no. Nothing negative about herself- She was paid $250? AL: ‘the standard fee.’ Anything negative about herself? AL: ”depressed, felt bad about herself.” From your reading with your memory what negative? Your reading- rightAL:  “yes, I did?” Anything negative? “I can’t tell you specifically” You need it in front of your face to read it right? AL: ”No”. Anything Negative?-AL: “not productive,  feels lousy about herself, not advanced in PPL, not forwarding her goals, I’m sure there are other things.” Giving us a positive view of the defendant as those aren’t that major? AL: ‘not that major.’
  3. Only conducted one interview JA- “Yes”. Then left with this roadmap-AL:” Isn’t this a guideline to take us to a post- a guideline you created ? AL: “Yes.” …and you can change it whenever you want? AL: “Yes”. She doesn’t even need to talk to anyone to reach her opinion. Snow White was a battered woman…AL”… If you show the entire you tube video.” That’s the title (AL because it was catchy). Gave a short form in Las Vegas. Also in LA in 2010 “An altered version.” One of the items used is her continuum “Not at all in speaking engagement.”
  4. Family of origin-of TA- AL:“Yes” Snow White had family of origin issues…AL:  ”for the perpetrator.” So you see him as the perpetrator? AL: ”Yes.” Use of Grimm’s Snow White fairy tale- AL: “I use the Walt Disney version” Father was King? AL: “yes.” He remarries? AL: “Yes” She’s less that savory with regard to Snow White – abuses Snow White- Father who has failed to protect? AL: “yes.” Snow White not treated correctly? AL: “She’s being abused “  Then she is out- then in the woods. The defendant suffered some abuse-AL: “yes.” Wicked stepmother was her Mom- and Father hit her? AL: “…Yes” One incident where he hit her and lost consciousness.  She did look at JA’s background. JA is sent out ‘into the woods.’ AL: “She chose to leave.” Why did she choose to leave? AL: “…abused and controlled.” She moves n with Bobby J. in less than ideal circumstances. S.W. lived in a shack- “I thought it was a cute cottage”. Other little kids to play with? No- cooking & cleaning? And singing…BJ was not working- providing money for food- “I don’t know what she said on the stand…yes she brought food in. Then the incident with the apple- her and BJ- “yes he choked her and verbally abused’ A violent act? Right? AL: “Correct.” She’s waiting for Prince Charming (unconscious).AL: “well unconscious.”   Then the Kiss right? AL: “Right” …and lives with Prince Charming- balance of power…AL: “she’s queen not sure …” Well he’s the King AL: “…yes more power.” She doesn’t have much power, right? <S> Power- King or Queen? AL:“not the content.” Even if it’s all made up you can still come to the opinion that the person on this fantastical world can be a victim of DV? AL: “That’s not what I say in my speech…not about Snow White being a battered woman.” Using your continuum and by reading this myth we can say Snow White was a battered woman” Judge-“” JM:…using Continuum and a myth we can determine Snow White was a battered woman? AL: “No…”
  5. Continuum—columns are not exclusive–….AL: “I don’t know about Snow White….not about child abuse.” Conference agenda dealt with adults? AL” yes it did.” Now you’re telling me I don’t want to talk about Snow White. AL: “No that’s not what I said.” Now you don’t want to talk about Snow White….AL: ”I didn’t talk about Snow White’s intimate relationship with the prince.“
  6. She “spoke to adults…about gender…in DV convention”. What you learn as children and bring into adulthood…like TA? “Correct”. Use as a victim of abuse (ex 558). Now disregard?  <O>
  7. (Wow—it’s nearly impossible for me to keep up with Martinez!)

Back Monday at 9:30.